Breast Cancer - Alternative Medicine
Success against cancer using Protocel®,
a highly effective non-toxic alternative treatment
Exploring breast cancer prevention and treatment options with
Pamela Hoeppner, author of The Breast Stays Put,
in search of answers, solutions and keys
The Breast Stays Put
Excellent Preventatives
* Protocel (Many use 1 bottle/yr.)
* Iodine
* Vitamin D3
* Iron (to achieve adequate levels only)
* Progesterone Cream
* DHEA
* Tumeric
* DIM
* Ellagic Acid
* Progesterone
* Sesame Lignans
* Brevail (Brand name)
* CLA
* A natural whole food multiple vitamin
* Omega 3 fatty acids
* B vitamins in a whole complex
* Vitamin C
* Vitamin E
* Candida Cleanse (Candex, etc. - numerous products avail)
* Melatonin
* Tryptophan (excellent for adequate sound sleep)
* Valerian Root " " "
* A sleep eye mask (to block out all light)
* Flax Seed Oil
* Cold pressed Olive Oil,
* Cold pressed Coconut Oil
* Organic Butter (never margerine)
* Organic Products whenever possible
* Pro-Biotic (Candida overgrowth is known to cause cancer.)
(The following are NOT compatible while on Protocel)
* Iodine
* Omega 3 Fatty Acids
* Essiac Tea
* Flax Seed Oil/Cottage Cheese
* Cesium
* DHEA
* CoQ10
* Ellagic Ins. Formula w/Graviola (Brand name)
* Eipcon Forte
As a side note: Women who have their estrogen levels tested who consume a lot of soy, as in soy milk, tofu, etc. typically have elevated estrogen levels-and sometimes they are off the charts.
Canola Oil is made from "rapeseed" and is a toxin
to the system. It's been put into use in this country because of economics. Choose olive, coconut, grapeseed, seasame whenever possible.
I remember the night Sheperd Smith reported on FOX News that CT Scans cause cancer. I thought at first that I didn't hear him right. But they came back from a break and he went on to explain that they have now proven that the very test they use to determine if someone has cancer actually causes it. One person in one thousand will get cancer down the road because of them. "That means," he said, "of the millions of CT scans given this past year, thousands will be diagnosed with cancer in years to come because it."
I still could hardly believe it, so I went online and did a search. And I found an article from September 4th of 2004! If I'd heard that segment on CBS I would have never had a second chest CT scan in April of '05! But this was the first I heard of it. I quote from the article:
. . . since whole-body CT scans to screen for disease are becoming more and more accessible to American consumers without the need for a doctor's referral or prescription, The Early Show medical correspondent Dr. Emily Senay
reports there is a concern that the radiation may cause cancer if it's used on a regular basis without good reason.
A new study in the journal Radiology points out that the radiation from a full-body CT scan may actually raise the risk of cancer as it's trying to detect it. They looked at people who were exposed to radiation from atomic bombs in Japan during World War II in amounts equivalent to a full-body CT scan.
They estimate that one full-body CT scan at the age of 45 increases the risk of cancer by one in 1200. Not a huge risk. But if that same person gets the same scan every year until age 75, the risk of cancer goes up to one in 50. That's a big risk.
How crazy is that! And did you catch that in the first paragraph? (It always intrigues me how they "qualify" and "rationalize" procedures and drugs that are known to cause harm by making these kinds of statements.)
" . . . there is a concern that the radiation may cause cancer if it's used on a regular basis without good reason.